Benchmarking density functional perturbation theory to enable high-throughput screening of materials for dielectric constant and refractive index

Ioannis Petousis, Wei Chen, Geoffroy Hautier, Tanja Graf, Thomas D. Schladt, Kristin A. Persson, and Fritz B. Prinz
Phys. Rev. B 93, 115151 – Published 31 March 2016
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

We demonstrate a high-throughput density functional perturbation theory (DFPT) methodology capable of screening compounds for their dielectric properties. The electronic and ionic dielectric tensors are calculated for 88 compounds, where the eigenvalues of the total dielectric tensors are compared with single crystal and polycrystalline experimental values reported in the literature. We find that GGA/PBE has a smaller mean average deviation from experiments (MARD=16.2%) when compared to LDA. The prediction accuracy of DFPT is lowest for compounds that exhibit complex structural relaxation effects (e.g., octahedra rotation in perovskites) and/or strong anharmonicity. Despite some discrepancies between DFPT results and reported experimental values, the high-throughput methodology is found to be useful in identifying interesting compounds by ranking. This is demonstrated by the high Spearman correlation factor (ρ=0.92). Finally, we demonstrate that DFPT provides a good estimate for the refractive index of a compound without calculating the frequency dependence of the dielectric matrix (MARD=5.7%).

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 6 October 2015
  • Revised 11 January 2016

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.115151

©2016 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Ioannis Petousis1,*, Wei Chen2,3, Geoffroy Hautier4, Tanja Graf5, Thomas D. Schladt5, Kristin A. Persson6, and Fritz B. Prinz1,7

  • 1Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
  • 2Energy Technologies Area, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 3Department of Mechanical, Materials and Aerospace Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
  • 4Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences, Université catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
  • 5Volkswagen Group Research, Berliner Ring 2, 38840 Wolfsburg, Germany
  • 6Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Hearst Mining Memorial Building, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 7Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA

  • *ioannis.petousis@gmail.com

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 93, Iss. 11 — 15 March 2016

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×